Skip to main content

Story

In July 2021, Ethical Consumer sent Amazon a questionnaire seeking information on how the company reported on its environmental impact. No response was received. A search of the company’s corporate website brought up many pages on the environment, which were used to rate Amazon’s environmental reporting against key indicators.

An environmental policy was deemed necessary to report on a company's environmental performance and set targets for reducing its impacts in the future. A strong policy would:

1. Include two future, quantified environmental targets

The report included quantified targets related to the company’s net zero carbon commitments, including :
net zero carbon across Amazon by 2040
powering its operations with 100% renewable energy by 2025

2. Demonstrate that the company had a reasonable understanding of its main environmental impacts, which needed to include at least a discussion of toxics, transportation, energy use and sourcing of raw materials

The report discussed the company’s efforts in relation to carbon emissions, renewable energy, transportation, packaging, energy use at fulfilment centres and offices, water saving, sale of sustainable products, and limiting the use of toxic chemicals in Amazon-owned personal care and household brands, circular economy, The report did not discuss the sourcing of raw materials and toxic chemicals in relation to its electronics brands. It was not therefore considered to have demonstrated adequate understanding of its environmental impacts.

3. Be dated within two years
The report contained data for the year 2020.

4. Have its environmental data independently verified
The carbon emission data in the report had been verified by Apex but not the other environmental data in the report.

Amazon met criteria 1 and 3. It therefore received Ethical Consumer's middle rating for Environmental Reporting and lost half a mark in this category.

Reference:

Amazon corporate website sustainability section (5 July 2021)